What can go wrong?
The answer, of course, depends on your perspective and your desired outcome. In my opinion, the worst that can happen is that our Constitution will be scrapped and replaced with one of the alternative socialist constitutions hanging around that will merge us firmly into the globalist New World Order. But that would be Good News for some folks.
Did you read Chapter 6 of Poison Drops that I mentioned in my blog?
Montgomery warned in 1886:
“My countrymen, disguise the fact as we may, there is in this country today, and in both the political parties, an element which is ripe for a centralized despotism. There are men and corporations of vast wealth, whose iron grasp spans this whole continent, and who find it more difficult and more expensive to corrupt thirty odd State Legislatures than one Federal Congress. It was said of Nero of old that he wished the Roman people had but one head, so that he might cut it off at a single blow. And so it is with those moneyed kings who would rule this country through bribery, fraud, and intimidation.
It is easy to see how, with all the powers of government centered at Washington in one Federal head, they could at a single stroke put an end to American liberty.”
Now that the takeover has been accomplished, the only thing preventing their absolute control is that bothersome document that occasionally impedes their progress. With a Con Con they can demolish the Constitution and lop off the head with a single blow and “government of the people, by the people, for the people” will perish from the earth and THEY will have total dominion over a country that was once a mighty and beautiful sight to behold—the “city on a hill,” “the light of the world.” I think that would be a tragic event in the history of the world.
Oh, we are promised that a Con Con is a perfectly safe method for proposing an amendment. A few virtuous, honorable statesman-types will get together for a week or so to discuss our wants and demands. They will write them up in acceptable format and send them out to the states for ratification. Convention adjourned. Congress bypassed. The people get their amendment. Easy-peasy!
What kind of fool believes that?!
James Madison, Father of the Constitution and fourth President of the United States said this:
"Having witnessed the difficulties and dangers experienced by the first Convention, I would tremble for the result of the second."
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Warren E. Burger warned:
"I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitution Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congressmen might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey it."
For a more up-to-date look at what the internationalists have been up to, let’s take a peek into Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, published in 1966.
Mike King writes:
“Tragedy and Hope was written for the academic crowd, and was never intended to be the “whistle-blowing” expose which it soon became. You see, the idealistic Quigley openly supported the utopian concept of a New World Order (the “Hope” in Tragedy and Hope). Here are key excerpts from the work of Clinton’s academic guru:
" There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act.... . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected ... to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." (Chapter 65)
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." (Chapter 20) (emphasis added)
The loose-lipped Professor also revealed the fraud behind America’s “two Party system”. This is a good one! :
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.” (3)
Clinton’s inner circle was filled with Globalist minded Rhodes Scholars and CFR members. Strobe Talbott, Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, was even more outspoken in his commitment to Globalism that Professor Quigley was. In a 1992 Op-Ed piece penned for Time Magazine, Talbott wrote:
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” (4)”
~*~*~*~*~
THEN, How about this 1954 speech by Senator William Jenner:
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.”
~*~*~*~*~
Many eye-opening quotes of former presidents can be found at http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/09/13/former-presidents-warn-about-the-invisible-government-running-united-states/
Let's look at one more presidential quote. From none other than the first Republican President—Abraham Lincoln. Go here to view the context of the statement.
“We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing its end.
It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood. . . .
It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes
me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war,
corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places
will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong
its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth
is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.
I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety
of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.
God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless.”
Unfortunately, his suspicions were correct, as Zachary Montgomery confirmed in 1886 and so many others since then.
With these “warning” messages from presidents and others, we have to wonder—were they intentionally giving us clues so that we could do something to stop/undo the takeover? Or, were they providing cover as they feigned innocence? Or, possibly, were they actually innocent—placed in their position to be “used" by others.
The same questions are asked as we try to understand a particular leader’s true motives today. In any case, though, intentional or not, evil or just stupid, anyone who works to undermine our Constitution, our sovereignty and our freedoms is part of the problem and an enemy of the people.
The internationalists are using a new tactic, a 180 degree spin-around—to put the power back into the hands of the states! But, don’t you see that it’s a trick, a Trojan horse? It’s merely a quick and dirty way to get rid of that bothersome document and replace it with one that’s more to their liking
Do you really think that state legislators are innocent in the “takeover” of the states? No way! They are complicit. If they are not “bought and paid for” they are, at the least, under the influence of such organizations as ALEC.
Why did that bunch of pathetic, spineless, self-serving buffoons in the West Virginia Senate not ban Common Core last session? NOT because, as the Ed. Dept. told them, it would cost millions of dollars to replace it. That story was only to provide cover for the Senators. The fact is that the Ed. Dept. wasn’t prepared for the sudden death of Common Core. By the 2016 legislative session, they will be ready. They will have a new program—which will be Common Core with a new name—all ready to go and, so, the Senate will now be allowed to be the heroes who banned Common Core.
Unfortunately, that’s the way it works. Your state legislature is NOT your friend! It would be a great leap of faith to give them access to a constitutional convention.
Want to see how the masses are controlled?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdar_PxApd8 [Uh-oh! That link no longer works. Try this one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SV2ew7b0VI updated 4/4/19 - BD] [Somebody doesn't want you to see this. Try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccF3oJZ_RiI
updated 3/7/24 BD]
PROPAGANDA / SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND THE MANUFACTURING OF HUMAN THOUGHT
Did you read Chapter 6 of Poison Drops that I mentioned in my blog?
Montgomery warned in 1886:
“My countrymen, disguise the fact as we may, there is in this country today, and in both the political parties, an element which is ripe for a centralized despotism. There are men and corporations of vast wealth, whose iron grasp spans this whole continent, and who find it more difficult and more expensive to corrupt thirty odd State Legislatures than one Federal Congress. It was said of Nero of old that he wished the Roman people had but one head, so that he might cut it off at a single blow. And so it is with those moneyed kings who would rule this country through bribery, fraud, and intimidation.
It is easy to see how, with all the powers of government centered at Washington in one Federal head, they could at a single stroke put an end to American liberty.”
Now that the takeover has been accomplished, the only thing preventing their absolute control is that bothersome document that occasionally impedes their progress. With a Con Con they can demolish the Constitution and lop off the head with a single blow and “government of the people, by the people, for the people” will perish from the earth and THEY will have total dominion over a country that was once a mighty and beautiful sight to behold—the “city on a hill,” “the light of the world.” I think that would be a tragic event in the history of the world.
Oh, we are promised that a Con Con is a perfectly safe method for proposing an amendment. A few virtuous, honorable statesman-types will get together for a week or so to discuss our wants and demands. They will write them up in acceptable format and send them out to the states for ratification. Convention adjourned. Congress bypassed. The people get their amendment. Easy-peasy!
What kind of fool believes that?!
James Madison, Father of the Constitution and fourth President of the United States said this:
"Having witnessed the difficulties and dangers experienced by the first Convention, I would tremble for the result of the second."
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Warren E. Burger warned:
"I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitution Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congressmen might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey it."
For a more up-to-date look at what the internationalists have been up to, let’s take a peek into Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, published in 1966.
Mike King writes:
“Tragedy and Hope was written for the academic crowd, and was never intended to be the “whistle-blowing” expose which it soon became. You see, the idealistic Quigley openly supported the utopian concept of a New World Order (the “Hope” in Tragedy and Hope). Here are key excerpts from the work of Clinton’s academic guru:
" There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act.... . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected ... to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." (Chapter 65)
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." (Chapter 20) (emphasis added)
The loose-lipped Professor also revealed the fraud behind America’s “two Party system”. This is a good one! :
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.” (3)
Clinton’s inner circle was filled with Globalist minded Rhodes Scholars and CFR members. Strobe Talbott, Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, was even more outspoken in his commitment to Globalism that Professor Quigley was. In a 1992 Op-Ed piece penned for Time Magazine, Talbott wrote:
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” (4)”
~*~*~*~*~
THEN, How about this 1954 speech by Senator William Jenner:
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the courts. It is practically irremovable.”
~*~*~*~*~
Many eye-opening quotes of former presidents can be found at http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/09/13/former-presidents-warn-about-the-invisible-government-running-united-states/
Let's look at one more presidential quote. From none other than the first Republican President—Abraham Lincoln. Go here to view the context of the statement.
“We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing its end.
It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood. . . .
It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes
me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war,
corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places
will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong
its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth
is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.
I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety
of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.
God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless.”
Unfortunately, his suspicions were correct, as Zachary Montgomery confirmed in 1886 and so many others since then.
With these “warning” messages from presidents and others, we have to wonder—were they intentionally giving us clues so that we could do something to stop/undo the takeover? Or, were they providing cover as they feigned innocence? Or, possibly, were they actually innocent—placed in their position to be “used" by others.
The same questions are asked as we try to understand a particular leader’s true motives today. In any case, though, intentional or not, evil or just stupid, anyone who works to undermine our Constitution, our sovereignty and our freedoms is part of the problem and an enemy of the people.
The internationalists are using a new tactic, a 180 degree spin-around—to put the power back into the hands of the states! But, don’t you see that it’s a trick, a Trojan horse? It’s merely a quick and dirty way to get rid of that bothersome document and replace it with one that’s more to their liking
Do you really think that state legislators are innocent in the “takeover” of the states? No way! They are complicit. If they are not “bought and paid for” they are, at the least, under the influence of such organizations as ALEC.
Why did that bunch of pathetic, spineless, self-serving buffoons in the West Virginia Senate not ban Common Core last session? NOT because, as the Ed. Dept. told them, it would cost millions of dollars to replace it. That story was only to provide cover for the Senators. The fact is that the Ed. Dept. wasn’t prepared for the sudden death of Common Core. By the 2016 legislative session, they will be ready. They will have a new program—which will be Common Core with a new name—all ready to go and, so, the Senate will now be allowed to be the heroes who banned Common Core.
Unfortunately, that’s the way it works. Your state legislature is NOT your friend! It would be a great leap of faith to give them access to a constitutional convention.
Want to see how the masses are controlled?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdar_PxApd8 [Uh-oh! That link no longer works. Try this one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SV2ew7b0VI updated 4/4/19 - BD] [Somebody doesn't want you to see this. Try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccF3oJZ_RiI
updated 3/7/24 BD]
PROPAGANDA / SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND THE MANUFACTURING OF HUMAN THOUGHT